Your Waste, Your Views

July 28, 2010 10:55 by richardm

Surrey Waste Partnership are reviewing their Plan for Waste Management in Surrey and want you to help shape it. Please take part in their public consultation between 17 May and 12 August 2010 and tell them your views.

Do mention the need to encourage waste reduction, in the first instance, and the requirement for plastic recycling collection, perhaps in place of the now removed bottle banks. This could be provided by Recresco, who currently just collect Tetra Paks.


MVDC Remove Bottle Banks

April 2, 2010 11:29 by richardm

During April 2010 Mole Valley District Council will be removing all its bottle banks. According to waste and recycling manager, Steve Strickland, the move is in order to save money, and residents will need to use their green recycling bins. Unfortunately the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF), in Randalls Road, Leatherhead, can't separate bottles by colour, so they're crushed and used in construction, rather than being recycled into new bottles.

Glass is 100% recyclable, can be endlessly recycled with no loss in quality and recycling two bottles saves enough energy to boil water for five cups of tea. For every tonne of recycled glass used, 1.2 tonnes of raw materials are preserved, which would otherwise have to be quarried from our landscape. On average, every family in the UK uses around 330 glass bottles and jars each year.

The one benefit from this move is that, with the space created, there's room for collecting items not currently taken in household green bins. Steve hopes that, in partnership with other organisations, additional recycling will be made available.


The Footprint Challenge!

December 31, 2009 16:43 by anneb

It's much more fun trying to reduce your carbon footprint in company with others and having some sort of target to aim for.  So to help encourage Mole Valley residents to cut their carbon we are inviting Mole Valley residents and their Councillors to take part in a 2010 footprint challenge, to see who can achieve the lowest carbon footprint - a resident or a councillor!

The contest is based on your individual household energy use, car use and airmiles during 2010 and your footprint is very easily calculated using www.thecarbonaccount.com.  The Green Mole Forum will present a small award to the winner.  If you saw the article  in the local press about the green granny with a zero footprint - don't think its not worth you entering as the green granny won't be so green in 2010 - she's flying to California to visit her son!

If you want to take part in this challenge contact us here or telephone 01372 456421.


Mole Valley CPRE public meeting "Housing and the Green Belt"

June 23, 2009 09:02 by matthewp

Open seminar this Thursdar.

The Green Belt in Surrey is under greater threat than ever before due to the government's 'South East Plan' seeking to impose a minimum target of 59.160 new homes in Surrey. In the Mole Valley District, three quarters of which is Metropolitan Green Belt, land has to be found for nearly 4,000 homes.

Present at this 'question time' style seminar will be:

  • John Howell MP from the Conservative shadow local government and planning team
  • Baroness Thomas of Walliswood, Lib Dem spokesperson for planning affairs 
  • Sir Paul Beresford, MP for Mole Valley
  • John Cheston, Deputy Director of Government Office for the South East
  • CPRE's expoert on planning matters, Paul Miner

Tickets £10 to include excellent buffet.

  • Thursday 25th June 2009 from 6.30pm
    • Supper 7.4
    • Seminar 7.45 - 9.15
  • Denbies Sports Hall
  • Ranmore Common, Dorking

Mole Valley District Council Transport Panel

March 24, 2009 08:46 by matthewp

Mole Valley District Council held two meetings to consult local residents on their opinions on public transport - one on the 18th February in Leatherhead, and a second on the 2nd March in Dorking.

With thanks to Simon Trevaskis we are pleased to be able to present the minutes of those meetings here.

The next stage of the Panel will be to arrange a meeting with the SCC Transport team and also Service Providers to discuss possible improvements.

18th February

 Notes of a meeting of the Transport Panel held on
 18th February 2009 from 7.00pm to 8.40pm at Park House, Leatherhead

   
Present:  Councillors Tim Hall (Chairman), Rosemary Dickson and David Howell

1. Apologies for Absence

An apology for absence was received from Councillor Paul Elderton

2. Focus Group Discussion

The Chairman, on behalf of the Panel, welcomed those Members of the Public present who had been invited to attend the meeting to discuss their views on the key transportation issues facing Mole Valley.

During the course of the discussion the following points were noted:-

General

• The views of a resident in Mole Valley towards the public transport provision would vary depending on whether they lived near the main bus routes.
• Would it be possible for the Council to speak to the larger employers in the area, regarding their travel needs, as they have a requirement to put together a travel plan for their employees?
• It is important to have regard for current services when making new proposals, as any additional services added to one area could be removed from another to compensate
• The current cost of using public transport in Mole Valley is high and for many residents it is only viable to use for multi-purpose trips.

Buses

• The Leatherhead Town-centre one-way system causes some of the bus routes to only stop at certain stops in one direction because of the extra time it takes to circle the entire one-way system to cover the missed stops.
• There is no public bus transportation after 6.00pm in the North of the District and the weekend service, particularly on Sundays is also limited.
• One problem with the limited evening and weekend services is it can be difficult to get to Epsom Hospital during these times. There are also problems travelling to St Helier Hospital, with the journey involving numerous changes.
• Some bus journeys are re-routed to cover school transportation, which means that some of the stops on the regular route can be missed during these times.
• The No. 465 bus is able to provide a good service across the North of Mole Valley, because it is heavily subsidized by Transport for Surrey.
• There is the possibility that the No. 465 bus could be re-routed through Fetcham. This will be decided following an upcoming meeting between Transport for Surrey and the Fetcham Residents Association.
• Being able to walk to their main bus stop is a problem for many residents across the North of the District and it would be useful to run a Hoppa bus service in Ashtead, Bookham, Fetcham and Leatherhead.
• Currently the yellow school buses are only used for school runs and are left, unused at the bus depot during the day. Would it be a possibility to uses these buses as Hoppa buses?
• If a Hoppa bus service were to be organised, the pricing would have to be carefully considered, as it would mean getting two tickets, if the service was being used to access the main public transport routes.
• It would be useful to have a bus service which ran from Bookham to Effingham Junction railway station, to take advantage of the fast commuter trains which run from this station.
• The bus timetable can be difficult to use and may prevent many people from using the service.
• There is the possibility that four real-time bus displays will be installed at four stops in the area, which will help make people aware when services will arrive.
• On the current timetable several of the bus stops are known by local landmarks that are no longer there. Unless you have been a resident in the area for a number of years it can be confusing to use..
• The public’s awareness of the transport options available is currently low. If more money was spent advertising the services available then the volume of passengers would increase.
• The bus pass system for older residents is very popular. Could it be extended to include people with low incomes, the unemployed and young people as these are groups who would benefit from concessionary fares.
• Would it be possible to extend the bus pass system to cover train travel as well?

Trains

• The Sunday train service from Guildford does not start until 8.20am; this can make it difficult for those people who need to get to work on a Sunday.
• The trains which run from Bookham to London are normally a stopping service, which have long journey times.
• Staffing at the District’s train stations is generally poor. This means that there are a lot of people using the train service without purchasing a ticket. It can also make it difficult for the people who want to buy a ticket.
• The figures provided by Transport for Surrey for the usage of both Dorking North and Dorking Deepdene stations are incorrect, as these figures indicate that the two stations are rarely used. This figure was currently being challenged by Dorking DNA.
• Due to accessibility problems at both Dorking North and Dorking Deepdene stations, users who are unable to access their intended train service from these stations are able to take a taxi ride to the nearest accessible station (either Box Hill & Westhumble or Reigate stations) and reclaim the cost of the fare from the rail companies.
• There is not a direct train service below Horsham and the final train service to Horsham is at 8.00pm on weekdays and at 6.00pm on weekends.

Other Work/Studies/Surveys

• The Bookham Residents Association is currently in the process of compiling its Village Plan, which will look at transport in the village as part of its work. There will be a questionnaire covering all parts of the Village Plan sent to every house in the area and it is also intended that surveys will be carried out at the train station to get more detailed views from public transport users. Once this work is completed in the summer it should provide a good study of the public transport needs of Bookham.
• Ashtead Residents Association is undertaking a feasibility study to look into establishing a ‘round the houses’ service in Ashtead. Should the results of the study indicate that the level of demand for this kind of service would be cost effective, then Buses4U may be able to provide a bus to facilitate this service. It is thought that this service would initially be targeted towards commuters and would operate between 6.30am to 9.00am and then in the evening. Should this service prove to be successful it could be extended for community use during the day.
• It may be a good idea to approach the Fetcham and Leatherhead Residents Associations to see if they would be prepared to carry out similar work, so that once completed there would be a set of overarching data for transport in the North of the District.
• Once the Bookham survey is complete it may be a good idea for them to address the other three residents associations in the North of the District to advise them about their experiences and how best to carry out the survey.

Taxi

• Mole Valley District Council has looked into the possibility of Taxi Drivers setting there fares based on a scientific basis, but has not managed to reach an agreement yet.
• The possibility of a subsidized taxi service in out-lying areas to allow residents to connect to main services would be a good idea.

The Chairman thanked the attendees for their informative contributions to the discussion.

3. Next Meeting
 
The Chairman confirmed to the Panel that a second focus group meeting would be held on 2nd March at Pippbrook, Dorking.

 

2nd March

Notes of a meeting of the Transport Panel held on
 2nd March 2009 from 7.00pm to 8.35pm at Park House, Leatherhead

   
Present:  Councillors Tim Hall (Chairman), Rosemary Dickson, Paul Elderton, David Howell and Tim Loretto

1. Focus Group Discussion

The Chairman, on behalf of the Panel, welcomed those Members of the Public present who had been invited to attend the meeting to discuss their views on the key transportation issues facing Mole Valley.

During the course of the discussion the following points were noted:-

Trains

• As there is not a train service running between Dorking and Horsham in the evenings and at weekends, it would be a good idea to run a replacement bus service to help residents in the South of the District.
• The accessibility problems at Dorking Mainline station should be solved by the end of this year, when a bridge and lift system is installed. However the exact date of the installation is still to be confirmed by Railtrack
• Due to the connection to Gatwick there is a possibility that there will be a third train per hour running between Reading and Redhill.
• At the moment it is not possible to run a direct service between Heathrow and Gatwick because of the lack of an electrified line between Reigate and Shalford.
• The connections between the bus and the train service at Dorking Train Station do not seem to be as coordinated as they could be, which can cause problems if you want to catch a connecting service.

Buses

• The bus service in the rural areas is extremely restricted and it can be difficult to work a 9:00am – 5:00pm shift in Leatherhead as the last bus from Leatherhead to Headley is 5:10pm.
• On certain rural routes the buses are too large for the roads they travel on. It would be easier and more economical if smaller buses were used for these routes.
• None of the bus routes in Mole Valley operate at a profit and all have to be subsidized by Transport for Surrey.
• If you are getting a return journey from the rural villages to Epsom, the return bus service runs 35 minutes after you arrive. The next return service is not for 4 hours because of the infrequency of the service. This is not convenient for residents in these areas who want to go to use the shops in Epsom.
• On Boxhill there is a large population of elderly and low income residents who live in the mobile home parks that need a public transport service, but have very poor transport links.
• When Pfizer Ltd built their offices they had a planning requirement put in place by Reigate and Banstead Borough Council that they had to provide a bus service for its employees from the main towns. Would it be possible to speak to Pfizer Ltd to see if this service could be extended for community use?
• In an ideal world bus routes running from Redhill to Epsom and Dorking to Leatherhead via Box Hill and Headley would be preferable for the residents in these areas.
• When planning a bus route it needs to be aimed for multi use trips – for instance both Community and Tourism uses. At the moment there seems to be a lot of small services, but none of them are coordinated.
• The level of Special Needs transport in the District isn’t as good as it should be. To improve this, the level of communication between the Schools and the Transport department needs to increase.
• The ideal service for Mole Valley would be to run a Hoppa bus service to connect the villages and the towns.
• One possibility would be to have a co-operative service between volunteer drivers and the bus companies for special events and youth events. This system allows the bus company to lend one its buses to a volunteer driver to run a service for an evening.
• All of the out of town superstores such as Tesco in Hookwood are running their own bus services which are taking business away from the town-centres.
• It is extremely difficult to get to the main estates in the south of Dorking after 6pm, with the final bus travelling south from Dorking being at 7.35pm.
• The bus garage is in Horsham, could there be a possibility of the buses returning to the garage to run a last service on its final journey, rather than driving back empty?
• The Dorking to Kingston route is tendered by Transport for London and it is down to them whether the service runs to Horsham.
• The 465 bus in Dorking currently terminates at Waitrose. It would be more useful if it ran until the North Holmwood roundabout where it could turn around for the return route.
• To ensure that the services provided are what people want then all possible conditions must be included in the specification of the franchise, when they are put out to tender. The bus companies are not going to run a night service unless they are being paid to as part of their tender.

General

• It would be a good idea to try to set up a shared taxi service in the District. This would allow residents who live in rural areas and have a lack of public transport facilities to share the cost of a taxi journey with other people from the same area.
• The Dorking DNA has looked into the costs of carrying out a feasibility study regarding potential transport options for the Dorking Health Check Area. It is estimated that this would cost £20,000. It maybe a good idea for this to be opened up to the whole District.
• The possibility of installing electronic bus time displays in Dorking has been looked into, but they will cost £10,000 each and the company who provides them will only service the boards for the first five years.
• The National Trust used to run a service to Polsden Lacey and Box Hill. It may be worthwhile contacting them to see if they would be willing to contribute to a service.

The Chairman thanked the attendees for their informative contributions to the discussion.


Mole Valley District Council tansport panel seeks your opinion

February 11, 2009 21:58 by matthewp

As part of its work programme for 2008/09, Mole Valley District  Council's Scrutiny and Audit Committee has set-up a Transport Panel  to investigate the current public transport provision across the  District.

The Transport Panel feel that before they meet with the relevant  service providers, it would be useful to meet with local public  transport users to get the views of the people who use these  services and try to identify realistic improvements that could be  made.

To enable the Panel to meet with residents they have arranged to hold two focus groups. One on Wednesday, 18th February at 7.00pm at Park House, Leatherhead and the other on Monday 2nd March at 7.00pm  at the Council Offices in Dorking.

So if you have an interest in public transport in Mole Valley the Chairman of the Transport Panel, Councillor Tim Hall, would like to invite you to attend either of these meetings to share your views.

Alternatively, if you know of anyone else that would be interested in attending, please let them know.

If you have any further questions, or would like to confirm your  interest in attending, please don't hesitate to make contact via the Green Mole Forum here.

Simon Trevaskis
Senior Democratic Services Officer
Mole Valley District Council


New regulation means schools have to pay £50 to continue composting

October 22, 2008 16:54 by matthewp

All over MoleValley and elsewhere schools have needed little encouragement to start composting alongside the new wave of garden clubs.

Suddenly they have been dealt a body blow with new regulations from Defra requiring all schools to pay £50 to register if they have a compost heap.

So much for encouraging the young to help save the planet from climate change!  Surely, you say, there's a mistake, there will be a dispensation for organisations such as schools and similar organisations.

No is the answer - Defra have confirmed that schools will have to register and pay £50 for the privilege, and the same rules will apply to any organisation (other than a private individual) if they want to compost. eg allotment societies, youth clubs, etc.

Ask anybody in the street what they think about this, and most people just don't believe it.   Mention it to a teacher and they are incandescent.   Everybody's second response is " nobody will take any notice, and will just carry on as before".   But why should we bring in new regulations that are just patently wrong? 

To be fair to Defra, this is still in the consultation stage, with a 100 page document on Revised Waste Exemptions covering everything that could possibly be called 'waste' and providing revised limits on the amount of each waste stream that is considered 'low-risk'.   [ It includes such gems as the 'Disposal of waste from a railway sanitary convenience', solemnly declaring that an environmental permit will be required if more that 25 litres is deposited at any one time onto a railway track.]

But the associated Regulations have already been written, so now is the time for action and protest to provide some sensible changes to the regulations so that composting doesn't have to become a moonlighting operation.

The consultation documents can be found  on the Defra website.

Comments should be sent to exemptions@defra.gsi.gov.uk  by Thursday 23 October 2008

 


Reduction in Mole Valley's Landfill Waste

October 9, 2008 16:12 by dereks

In the report of our visit to the Leatherhead MRF on 24 September, we said:

“Although Mole Valley has reduced the fraction of its waste that goes to landfill, the total quantity of waste we produce is still increasing. The net effect is that Mole Valley's landfill waste has only stabilised rather than reduced in quantity.”

Steve Strickland, Mole Valley’s Recycling Officer, has since contacted us and provided the following figures for Mole Valley’s landfill waste:

Year end March 06 - 18 700 tons

Year end March 07 - 15 700 tons

Year end March 08 - 15 000 tons

The big drop in 06/07 was caused by the introduction of the green bins.  Glass recycling started in Jan 08. These figures paint a much better picture than we understood from our visit, and we are happy to provide this correction.


Local Govt Association report calls for free home insulation

October 1, 2008 15:14 by dereks

The Local Government Association, representing all the local councils in the UK, has called for an urgent nationwide programme to fit free loft and cavity wall insulation to all the homes that will benefit from them.  It is free because the LGA says that the big utility suppliers should fund this out of their profits.  You can read and download the LGA report from this address.

www.lga.gov.uk/lga/aio/971071.


Visit to Leatherhead Materials Recovery Facility (MRF)

September 25, 2008 18:35 by estherpc

On 24th September a number of us from Green Mole Forum went on a guided tour of the Leatherhead MRF. This is next to the household waste site in Randalls Road and receives green bin waste from both Mole Valley and two adjacent districts. We were able to see all the processing stages in action. I didn't take notes at the time but from memory the process goes like this:

  1. Feed mixed waste is crushed to crush the glass bottles
  2. Crushed glass is removed by gravity (it's heavier than everything else)
  3. Ferrous metals are removed by magnets
  4. Aluminium cans are removed by a different sort of magnet (excuse my technical ignorance here)
  5. Plastic bottles are removed by hand pickers
  6. Non-recyclables like plastic bags are removed by hand pickers
  7. What is left is paper and card with a maximum of 2% plastic.

The products from 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 are collected and packaged separately and sold for the best price the operator Grundon can get. The paper is turned into large bales which you can see below.

  

Mole Valley District Council and Grundon clearly see this plant as a success story. Mole Valley now has one of the highest recycling rates in the UK. We also learnt that Mole Valley residents produce high quality recyclable waste - we obey the rules for what can go in the green bins and this helps the MRF produce high quality products.  More recycling means less waste to landfill and this makes money for the council in two ways - it pays less landfill tax, and gets paid for processing other councils' waste.  We were told that the plant makes a profit for Grundon, but were not given the figures: a commercial secret presumably.

Unfortunately it's not all good news.

Although Mole Valley has reduced the fraction of its waste that goes to landfill, the total quantity of waste we produce is still increasing. The net effect is that Mole Valley's landfill waste has only stabilised rather than reduced in quantity. The two big recycling challenges are how to recycle (1) food waste and (2) more plastics. The food from the present Mole Valley food waste collection trials has to go to a plant in Dorset as this is the nearest licenced plant in the UK - not ideal.  Surrey County Council is considering building a digester plant in Surrey to process food and green waste and this looks like something that we should support.  (Mole Valley's garden waste presently is composted in Reading and then used by farmers). The problem with plastic is that there are too many types used in packaging. Grundon hopes that the packaging industry will settle on one type of plastic that can be used for most products and can be recycled. There also needs to more re-usable containers, and this is something we should watch out for and support.

 

 

 

 


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner